property
Rent-Vesting in Mentone: How Local Buyers Are Playing the Property Market From Both Sides
With purchase prices outpacing wages along the Mentone foreshore, a growing number of residents are renting where they live and buying where they can afford, and the maths is starting to make sense.
How we reported this

The median asking rent for a two-bedroom unit within walking distance of Mentone train station has climbed to roughly $2,100 per month, while the same property would cost a buyer somewhere north of $680,000 to purchase outright. That gap, between what it costs to occupy a home and what it costs to own one, is quietly reshaping how a portion of the local population is thinking about property altogether.
The strategy has a name: rent-vesting. It means renting your primary residence in a location you want to live, say, a flat off Mentone Parade near the beach, while simultaneously purchasing an investment property in a suburb or town where yields are stronger and entry prices are lower. For buyers priced out of the Mentone foreshore but unwilling to sacrifice proximity to the bay, it offers a third path between renting indefinitely and stretching into crippling mortgage stress.
Why the Numbers Work Here, and Why Now
Mentone's appeal has not softened. The strip of cafes and independent retailers along Como Parade, the presence of Mentone Grammar School drawing family buyers from across the region, and reliable rail connections have kept demand sticky even as interest rates stayed elevated through late 2025 and into the first half of 2026. For owner-occupiers, that stickiness translates to compressed yields, gross rental yields on houses in the suburb have hovered around 2.8 to 3.1 percent, meaning a landlord collecting rent on a $950,000 house is earning back less than $30,000 per year before expenses. That is a thin return for capital tied up at that scale.
Rent-vestors flip this logic on its head. Rather than pouring savings into a low-yield Mentone property, they rent a place on, say, Balcombe Road or near the Mentone RSL on Venice Street, pay market rent, and direct their borrowing capacity toward a market where gross yields sit closer to 5 or 6 percent. The rental income from the investment property partially offsets their own rent payments, and they maintain exposure to property price growth without needing to buy at the upper end of the local market.
The Practical Risks Rent-Vestors Face
The strategy is not without friction. Renters, even those who own property elsewhere, have no security of tenure in their primary home. A landlord can issue a notice to vacate, forcing a household to relocate from a Mentone property they have treated as a long-term base. There is also a psychological dimension: many people find it difficult to commit to rental living while carrying a mortgage on a home they never sleep in.
Tax treatment adds another layer of complexity. Investment property owners can claim deductions on loan interest, property management fees, and depreciation, but those benefits apply to the investment asset, not to the rent a person is paying on their own home. A buyer whose investment property runs at a loss, often called negative gearing, can offset that loss against other income, which softens the blow of holding costs. Whether that calculation favours rent-vesting over conventional ownership depends heavily on individual income, loan structure, and the quality of the investment asset selected.
Local buyers considering the approach would do well to map the numbers carefully before committing. A purchase price of $480,000 in a regional centre with a gross yield of 5.5 percent generates around $26,400 in annual rent, meaningfully different from holding the equivalent capital in a low-yield Mentone asset. But vacancies, property management fees typically running at 7 to 10 percent of rent, and maintenance costs all erode that figure.
For residents who love Mentone's Merinda Park end of the suburb or the quieter pockets behind the Mentone Girls' Secondary College on Venice Street but cannot justify committing $900,000 or more to an entry-level house, rent-vesting represents a structurally rational response to a market that has become expensive to own but remains desirable to occupy. The approach suits people with stable incomes, a tolerance for complexity, and a clear-eyed view of what they are actually trying to achieve, lifestyle in one postcode, capital growth in another.
This article is general information only and is not personal financial or investment advice. Consider your own circumstances and seek licensed professional advice before making financial decisions.